For a reputation

It's going to come out. You haven't decided who hears it from you.

What would Gracián tell you to reveal, and to whom? What would Sun Tzu? Assemble a council of history's sharpest minds, bring them the date it runs, and hear them disagree about whether you get ahead of it, stay silent, or occupy the two people who matter.

Two full sessions, free · Private to your account · Nobody reads a sitting

Join the first 200 people who would rather be disagreed with.

This council

  • Baltasar GraciánBaltasar Gracián
  • Jane AustenJane Austen
  • MachiavelliMachiavelli
  • Sun TzuSun Tzu
  • Nobody else is in the room.

    A sitting is private to your account. Nobody reads it. Nothing is published, sold, or used to train anything. Encrypted at rest, keyed to you.

  • The sharpest minds of their age.

    Each advisor is one of the masters of their time, built from the work they left. Not a costume, not a living influencer, and not a panel of strangers who happen to argue.

  • Built to disagree.

    They ask first, hold a position, and refuse to flatter. That is in how they are built.

Why a council

The stress is not the story. It is sitting with it alone.

Speak or wait. Both cost. You can see the doors. You cannot tell which one is control and which one is hiding until the headline does it for you. The longer you wait, the more they look the same.

  • 01 — The trade

    You don't know who the capital is.

    Not because you lack facts. Because you have not named whose opinion of you cannot be earned back, and whose can. The story will be the same. The source will not.

  • 02 — The comfort

    Waiting feels like not making it worse.

    A lawyer, a friend, a night of drafts. Comfort is not counsel. After it runs, the terrain is gone.

  • 03 — The room

    You need the masters of timing and of faces.

    Gracián, Austen, Machiavelli, Sun Tzu — the sharpest minds of their age on what to reveal, to whom, in what order, and which ground is already lost. They will still send you out with one action.

This council

This table, for this hour.

Gracián, Austen, Machiavelli, Sun Tzu — history's sharpest minds on who hears it from you, and in what order. Change them if you want. They will not agree.

Your table  4 of 5 · Ready

The ChairThe Chair
Baltasar Gracián
Jane Austen
Machiavelli
Sun Tzu
5Empty

The room is ready. They will not agree.

The room

Click a face to seat them. Click again to send them out.

Read the full profiles →

Or sit a ready-made council

Baltasar GraciánJane AustenMachiavelliSun Tzu

A sitting like this

They ask before they answer.

Most AI helps you draft the statement. A real council wants the facts first. This is how a sitting on a piece that runs Thursday reads.

Session · 3 advisors seated

A journalist called yesterday. The piece is about a decision I made. It runs Thursday. The people in it don't know.
The Chair
Before anyone speaks: what, exactly, will the piece say that they do not know? And did you confirm anything, or did you delay?
That I was the one who killed the project. I said I needed a day. I haven't called anyone.
Baltasar Gracián
Whoever hears it from the paper will remember the source, not the nuance. You have a day. Use it on the two people whose opinion of you is capital. Not a thread. Not a group. Two conversations, in that order.
Jane Austen
They will read the piece as a performance of who you are. If they hear it from you first, you are the person who told them. If they hear it from a headline, you are the person who hid. The facts can be the same.
Gracián. One of them will leak it further if I tell them.
Sun Tzu
Then you are already on their ground. Tell the one who will be hit, not the one who collects. Do not fight the article. Occupy the two people before Thursday. After Thursday the terrain is gone.

An example of how the room reads this. Not a sitting anyone sent in.

How a session runs

Question. Positions. Verdict.

Nobody advises until the facts are on the table. Then the room argues. Then one person rules.

  1. The Chair

    Before anyone speaks: what, exactly, will the piece say that they do not know? And did you confirm anything, or did you delay?

    First

    The Chair asks.

    Two or three sentences from you. Then one or two precise questions back. Nobody advises until the facts are on the table.

  2. Baltasar Gracián

    Whoever hears it from the paper will remember the source, not the nuance. You have a day. Use it on the two people whose opinion of you is capital. Not a thread. Not a group. Two conversations, in that order.

    Jane Austen

    They will read the piece as a performance of who you are. If they hear it from you first, you are the person who told them. If they hear it from a headline, you are the person who hid. The facts can be the same.

    Then

    Your advisors take positions.

    Each reads the situation through their own lens. Two of them will disagree. You can press any of them by name. They hold their ground.

  3. DecisionTell the two people the piece will hit, before it runs. Do not try to kill the story.
    ActionTwo calls today. What the piece will say, in your words. No spin.
    ByTonight

    Last

    The Chair rules.

    One decision, one concrete action, one deadline. The next morning the Chair writes, and the room continues.

Read this before you sit down

What the Council is not.

  • Not therapy.

    If you're struggling, please talk to a professional. The Council is for decisions, not healing, and it will say so if your situation needs more than a decision.

  • Not a yes-man.

    Most AI tells you what you want to hear. The Council is built to disagree with you when you're wrong, and to keep disagreeing when you push.

  • Not generic advice.

    Every answer is about your situation, your people, your constraints. If the Council doesn't know enough, it asks. It doesn't guess.

The difference is the room, not a costume prompt. Why this is not ChatGPT →

Pricing

Cheaper than one bad decision.

Two full sessions, free, with everything the room does. Then Member for 5 sessions a month, Plus for 5× that, Patron for 20×. Pay yearly and take 20% off. Patron names go on the wall — first 200.

Free

Try the room

$0

  • 2 full sessions, on the house — no expiry, no refill
  • A council of three to five advisors, built from what they wrote
  • The Chair asks first, then rules: one decision, one action, one date
  • Advisors that disagree and hold their ground — press any of them by name
  • Speak or type
  • The Chair writes the morning after a verdict
  • Every sitting saved, encrypted, and sealed to your account

Member

For a decision a week

$15/ month

Everything in Free, plus:

  • More usage — 5 full sessions every month
  • Refilled on the first of the month
  • Cancel any time

Plus

For the ones who come back

$28/ month

Everything in Member, plus:

  • 5× Member usage — 25 full sessions every month
  • Seminars — sit with one advisor and go into their thought
  • New advisors as they join

Patron

For the ones who keep it open

$78/ month

Everything in Plus, plus:

  • 20× Member usage — 100 full sessions every month
  • Your name on the wall — first 200
  • A say in who joins the Council next
See the wall →

Questions

Before you ask the Council.

  • Can't I just prompt ChatGPT?

    You can. You will get one voice, in costume, already inclined to agree with you. The Council seats three to five advisors built from what they actually wrote, makes them disagree, and ends with a decision you have to act on. That is a room. A prompt is not.

    The technical note →

  • Is this real AI, or people?

    AI advisors, each built on the actual writings and ideas of the person they're named after. They are built to ask first, disagree when they should, and never flatter. No person is sitting behind the names.

  • Why these advisors?

    Each one brings a way of reading a situation that the others don't. Power, self-control, incentives, reputation, courage, what people really want. Every one of them is in the public domain, and none of them will ever be swapped for a living influencer.

  • Is my situation private?

    Yes. A sitting is private to your account. Nobody reads it — not Theo, who built this, not a staff, not a partner. Nothing you write is published, sold, shared, or used to train a model. It is encrypted at rest, keyed to your account. The model sees a turn only to answer it. You can allow a thirty-day review to improve the room; that is off unless you switch it on.

    How a sitting is sealed →

  • Will they just agree with me?

    No. The Council is built so that advisors hold their positions when you push back. They'll concede a point, never the conclusion, unless you bring a fact that changes it.

  • When does the full app launch?

    The web version you're looking at is live now. Your first two full sessions are free, with everything the room does. After that, Member is $15 a month for five sessions a month, Plus $28 for 5× that (and seminars with one advisor), Patron $78 for 20× — first 200 names on the wall. Pay yearly and take 20% off. The mobile app comes later.